From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Do Calcium Channel Blockers Cause Cancer?

Calcium channel blockers can interfere with apoptosis, or regulated cell death, one of the body's defenses against cancer. In this prospective cohort study, investigators followed 5052 patients over age 70 for an average of 3.7 years and examined the incidence of cancer in 451 patients who took calcium blockers versus 4601 who did not.

At baseline, patients on calcium channel blockers had higher rates of cardiovascular disease and disability, and lower diastolic blood pressure. Calcium channel blocker users were 1.72 times more likely to develop cancer, after adjustment for confounders. This effect was significant for verapamil and nifedipine, but not for diltiazem. Dose-response analysis confirmed that patients taking higher doses had higher risk. Calcium blockers were significantly associated with cancers of the uterus and adnexa, lymphatic system, and hematopoietic system; risk was also increased for cancers of the stomach, prostate, colon, breast, and urinary tract. Careful multivariate analysis failed to identify any other pharmacologic correlates with cancer.

Comment: This study and others fuel the calcium channel blocker controversy. Like prior epidemiologic studies associating these agents with increased cardiac mortality among hypertensives, this study has limitations. Patients on calcium blockers had more frequent admissions, leading to a greater opportunity for cancer detection. Also, shorter-acting regimens were used in this study than are currently prescribed. Finally, patients on calcium blockers may have had a condition predisposing them to cancer. Only careful prospective, randomized trials can provide the answers.

— KA Eagle

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology November 1, 1996

Citation(s):

Pahor M et al. Calcium-channel blockade and incidence of cancer in aged population. Lancet 1996 Aug 24 348 493-497.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1996. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.