From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation and Acute MI Outcome

Intra-aortic balloon pumping reduces afterload and increases coronary blood flow. Previous studies have suggested that routine use may effectively improve reperfusion following thrombolysis or balloon angioplasty. This single-center Dutch study randomized 238 patients who presented within three hours of MI symptom onset to treatment with or without an intra-aortic balloon pump.

Rates for the combined endpoint of death, nonfatal reinfarction, stroke, or an ejection fraction less than 30 percent at six months were identical (26 percent) for both groups, and enzymatic infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ significantly between groups. However, 8 percent of patients who received the intra-aortic balloon pump experienced major complications (e.g., bleeding, limb ischemia, or infection).

Comment: Although these results are weakened by the crossover rates for the intra-aortic balloon pump group and the group that did not receive a balloon pump (25 percent and 31 percent, respectively), they confirm the findings of the multicenter Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI II) trial. Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pumping after primary angioplasty does not improve clinical outcomes or promote myocardial recovery in high-risk patients with acute MI. As suggested by the authors, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation should be reserved for hemodynamically unstable patients.

— BJ Meyer

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology August 13, 1999

Citation(s):

Van 't Hof AWJ et al. A randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon pumping after primary coronary angioplasty in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999 May 20 659-665.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 1999. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.