From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Sympathetic Blockade for Patients Experiencing "Electrical Storm"

The term "electrical storm" (ES) is used to describe a cluster of repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation requiring multiple cardioversions. Most patients who experience ES, particularly in association with ischemia or MI, die within minutes. To test whether sympathetic blockade might be effective for treating ES, investigators prospectively examined 49 patients who experienced ES between 3 days and 3 months after MI.

Within 1 hour of discontinuation of antiarrhythmic agents that were used during the initial cardiac arrest code (according to Advanced Cardiac Life Support [ACLS] guidelines), 27 patients received sympathetic blockade; the remaining 22 continued to receive conventional ACLS-guided treatment. Among those treated with sympathetic blockade, 6 underwent left stellate ganglionic blockade, 7 received esmolol, and 14 received popranolol.

The 1-week mortality rate was significantly higher among those who received ACLS-guided treatment alone than among those treated with sympathetic blockade (82 percent vs. 22 percent). Among all patients who survived the initial ES event and were discharged from the hospital (total, 22), 1-year survival was excellent (86 percent). The overall survival rate at 1 year was significantly higher among patients treated with sympathetic blockade (18 of 27, 67 percent) than among those treated conventionally (1 of 22, 5 percent).

Comment: Despite the obvious design limitations of this single-center study, the dramatically higher survival rate among patients experiencing an electrical storm who received sympathetic blockade versus those who received conventional therapy is too large to ignore. These findings ought to be taken seriously by physicians who are involved in the care of such patients. Further studies should address unanswered questions, including which sympathetic-blockade approach is optimal and whether some subgroups respond differently to sympathetic blockade.

— H Calkins

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology November 9, 2000

Citation(s):

Nademanee K et al. Treating electrical storm: Sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation 2000 Aug 15 102 742-747.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.