From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Similar 1-Year Outcomes for Women and Men After Coronary Artery Stenting

Although higher complication and lower success rates have been reported for women who undergo coronary interventions than for men, potential sex differences in outcomes after coronary artery stenting have not been examined. These investigators studied a consecutive series of 3263 men and 1001 women with stable or unstable angina who had been referred for coronary artery stenting to 2 tertiary care hospitals in Germany from May 1992 through December 1998. Patients who underwent stenting in the setting of acute MI were excluded.

Compared with male subjects, female subjects were older and more likely to be diabetic, hypertensive, and hypercholesterolemic; however, they were less likely to have multivessel disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and histories of MI or bypass surgery. Disease in women was more common in the left anterior descending artery and in smaller vessels compared with disease in men. No significant sex-related differences were found for stent characteristics, procedural success, and use of adjunctive pharmacologic therapy.

During the first 30 days after stenting, the rate of the combined endpoint of death or nonfatal MI was higher among women than among men (3.1 percent vs. 1.8 percent; P=0.02; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02; 95 percent CI, 1.27-3.19). At 1 year, however, rates were similar (6.0 percent for women, 5.8 percent for men). Coronary-vessel size did not correlate with the 30-day outcome.

Comment: The findings of this large cohort study provide new insights into the role of sex in both short- and long-term outcomes after coronary artery stenting. Although an early hazard was associated with stenting in women, 1-year outcomes were similar between sexes. This supports an approach to treatment, incorporating stenting, that is as aggressive for women with coronary artery disease as it is for men with CAD. Finally, consistent with prior results, adverse outcomes were particularly prevalent among women with diabetes; this high-risk subset may derive the greatest benefit from the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in conjunction with stenting.

— JM Foody

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 1, 2000

Citation(s):

Mehilli J et al. Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting. JAMA 2000 Oct 11 284 1799 -1805.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2000. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.