From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Minimally Invasive Surgery vs. Stenting of the LAD Artery

This study extends the results of previous surgery-versus-stent comparisons to minimally invasive surgery.

In this single-center German study, 220 patients with isolated high-grade lesions in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery were randomized either to elective intracoronary stenting or to elective, minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Surgery involved a limited left thoracotomy with distal anastomosis performed on the beating heart and aided by mechanical stabilizers. All patients had normal left-ventricular function.

All stent procedures were successful (mean number of stents, 1.2; mean stent length, 15.1 mm). By 6 months, 2 patients experienced subacute stent thrombosis and 2 suffered strokes. Surgery was successful in 95% of patients; conversion to full sternotomy was required in 5%. Reoperation was required in 3 patients due to anastomotic stenosis or occlusion, causing MIs in 2. In 2 patients, anastomosis was performed erroneously on the diagonal artery; 1 of these patients consequently required a stent.

By 6 months, there were 3 additional MIs, 1 stroke, 2 chest-wall hernia repairs, and 2 early deaths in the surgery group. However, surgery patients were significantly less likely than stent patients to experience angina (21% vs. 38%), to require antianginal medications (6% vs. 19%), and to require repeat target-vessel revascularization (8% vs. 29%).

Comment: These findings extend the results of previous surgery-versus-stent comparisons to minimally invasive surgery. By 6 months, surgery provided better relief of angina with fewer repeat revascularizations. However, surgery was associated with more early complications and longer recoveries. The choice between surgery and stenting requires consideration of many factors (e.g., lesion type and location, patient comorbidities, patient preferences) and likely will be affected greatly in the near future by the availability of drug-eluting stents.

— Howard C. Herrmann, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology October 4, 2002

Citation(s):

Diegeler A et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002 Aug 22; 347:561-6.

MacGillivray TE and Vlahakes GJ. Angioplasty versus minimally invasive bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002 Aug 22; 347:551-2.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.