From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

CRP vs. LDL for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk

CRP and LDL may identify different groups of people who are at risk for a first adverse cardiovascular event.

Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory marker, and of LDL cholesterol each predict adverse cardiovascular events. To compare CRP with LDL directly, investigators measured baseline levels of both in 27,939 healthy Women's Health Study participants. Incidence of MI, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death were assessed prospectively during a mean 8-year follow-up.

Participants were stratified into quintiles of both CRP and LDL levels. Progressively higher levels of each showed clear, inverse linear correlations with event-free survival rates over time, even after adjustment for age, smoking status, diabetes, blood pressure, and hormone replacement therapy. Notably, CRP predicted event-free survival and each event type even better than LDL did. CRP and LDL levels were correlated only minimally.

Median CRP level was 1.52 mg/L; median LDL level was 123.7 mg/dL (3.20 mmol/L). When women with below-median CRP and below-median LDL levels were used as the reference group, multivariable-adjusted relative risks for a first event were these: below-median CRP, above-median LDL (1.5); above-median CRP, below-median LDL (1.5); above-median CRP, above-median LDL (2.1). When the analysis was confined to nonusers of HRT, the RRs were 1.5, 1.7, and 2.4, respectively.

Comment: The authors conclude that CRP may be better than LDL for predicting adverse cardiovascular events and that CRP adds predictive value. The precise role CRP plays in cardiovascular disease remains unclear: Is it really a risk factor? An accompanying editorial cautions against widespread CRP screening before it is clear exactly how clinicians should use screening results. Also note that statin therapy has been shown to be as effective in reducing adverse event rates in people with elevated CRP as in people with elevated cholesterol (Journal Watch Cardiology Aug 31 2001). Future trials must assess whether reducing CRP levels, with statins or by other means, actually limits event rates.

— Joel M. Gore, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 13, 2002

Citation(s):

Ridker PM et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2002 Nov 14; 347:1557-65.

Mosca L. C-reactive protein -- To screen or not to screen? N Engl J Med 2002 Nov 14; 347:1615-7.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.