From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Reteplase plus Abciximab vs. Reteplase Alone in STEMI: 1-Year Data from GUSTO-V

Standard and combination therapy yielded identical 1-year mortality rates.

GUSTO-V was the first large-scale mortality trial to compare standard fibrinolytic therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition plus reduced-dose fibrinolysis in patients with ST-segment-elevation MI (STEMI; Journal Watch Cardiology Aug 3 2001). In GUSTO-V, 16,588 STEMI patients were randomized to half-dose reteplase plus full-dose abciximab or to standard-dose reteplase.

Thirty-day mortality rates in GUSTO-V did not differ for the 2 approaches. However, the combination approach did yield lower 30-day rates of reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, and need for urgent revascularization, although it also had some early-bleeding disadvantages.

The GUSTO-V researchers now report 1-year mortality rates, which were identical for the 2 treatment groups (both 8.38%).

Comment: GUSTO-V showed no mortality benefit for half-dose reteplase plus full-dose abciximab over reteplase alone in STEMI patients. In addition, this combination approach was associated with more early bleeding. Combination therapy may have a potential role in facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention, but data from a large trial (e.g., FINESSE) are needed before such an approach can be advocated for treating STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Whether, in general, combination therapy should be an alternative to fibrinolysis for STEMI also requires further study.

— JoAnne M. Foody, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 27, 2002

Citation(s):

Lincoff AM et al. Mortality at 1 year with combination platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and reduced-dose fibrinolytic therapy vs conventional fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: GUSTO V randomized trial. JAMA 2002 Nov 6; 288:2130-5.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.