From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

On- vs. Off-Pump CABG: Cognitive Outcomes

In a study from the Netherlands of 281 selected patients randomized to on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, short-term cardiac outcomes did not differ between groups (Journal Watch Cardiology Jan 11 2002). Now, the investigators present 3-month and 1-year cognitive-outcome data.

Trained psychologists assessed cognitive function with 10 pre- and post-surgery neuropsychological tests. By 3 months, cognitive decline had occurred in 21% of the off-pump group and in 29% of the on-pump group (P=0.15); by 12 months, the rates were 31% and 34%, respectively (P=0.69). No statistically significant between-groups differences were noted at 3 or 12 months in the secondary outcomes of quality of life, stroke rate, and all-cause mortality.

Comment: In this important study of patients undergoing elective CABG, long-term cognitive outcomes did not differ after off- versus on-pump surgery. As the editorialists note, however, this study was underpowered to detect meaningful cognitive-outcome differences between the 2 approaches. Furthermore, the cohort was significantly younger and had a substantially lower risk for adverse outcomes than U.S. patients who undergo off-pump CABG. Although this study provides important, new data on the effect of off-pump CABG on long-term cognitive function, only larger randomized trials can offer clearer answers.

— JoAnne M. Foody, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology April 26, 2002

Citation(s):

van Dijk D et al. for the Octopus Study Group. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized trial. JAMA 2002 Mar 20; 287:1405-12.

Mark DB and Newman MF. Protecting the brain in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2002 Mar 20; 287:1448-50.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.