From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin and Clopidogrel

What do we do when the most effective regimen is not necessarily the most cost-effective?

Antiplatelet agents have emerged as important therapy for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). Evidence shows that, compared with aspirin, clopidogrel can reduce the combined risk for MI, stroke, or death. Moreover, in patients with an acute coronary syndrome, adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy can further reduce risk for future adverse events. Is the additional cost of clopidogrel worth its extra benefit? These investigators used computer simulation to estimate the cost-effectiveness of several antiplatelet treatment strategies in U.S. patients with CHD (age range, 35 to 84) from 2003 to 2027.

Compared with current practice patterns, extending aspirin therapy to all eligible CHD patients (not yet a reality) would cost $11,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. A strategy of aspirin for all eligible patients and clopidogrel for those with aspirin intolerance had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $31,000 per QALY gained over aspirin alone. Clopidogrel for all patients had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $250,000 per QALY gained over the $31,000 strategy. Finally, for a strategy of clopidogrel for all patients plus aspirin for eligible patients, the ratio was $130,000 per QALY gained over the $31,000 strategy.

Comment: This analysis shows the potential costs of various antiplatelet-therapy strategies. Patients may wish to have the most effective regimen, but payors may consider the cost-benefit ratio too high. This type of analysis should prompt discussions about resource allocations in the healthcare system. Are we ready to debate how much we are willing to pay to improve outcomes?

— Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology August 16, 2002

Citation(s):

Gaspoz J-M et al. Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2002 Jun 6; 346:1800-6.

Wood AJJ. When increased therapeutic benefit comes at increased cost. N Engl J Med 2002 Jun 6; 346:1819-21.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.