From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Top Story

ICDS BENEFICIAL IN A MORE EASILY IDENTIFIABLE POPULATION

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) prolong survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a positive electrophysiology study (Journal Watch Cardiology Jan 21 2000). The MADIT II trial was designed to determine whether ICDs prolong survival in a more easily identifiable population: patients with prior MI and LV ejection fractions of ≤30%. A total of 1232 such patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to either ICD implantation or conventional medical therapy; mean follow-up was 20 months. Demographic features of the 2 groups were similar: For example, 70% of both received concomitant beta-blocker therapy; both had mean LVEFs of 23%.

The mortality rate was 31% lower in the ICD group than in the conventional-therapy group (14.2% vs. 19.8%, P=0.016) -- an effect that persisted after stratification by age, sex, LVEF, NYHA class, and QRS interval. Complications related to ICD implantation included lead problems (1.8%) and nonfatal infection (0.7%), but no deaths. A trend toward more new or worsening heart failure emerged in the ICD group (19.9% vs. 14.9%, P=0.09).

Comment: These results show, for the first time, that prophylactic ICD placement improves survival in patients with prior MI and LVEFs ≤30%. Both the magnitude of benefit (31% mortality-risk reduction) and the simplicity of the approach are striking. Notably, electrophysiology testing was not used to identify high-risk patients. The data suggest that ICDs should be considered for all patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The authors hope that if a significant proportion of the more than 3 million patients with coronary artery disease and advanced LV dysfunction receive ICDs, market forces will drive down costs. Clearly, such a scenario's cost-effectiveness should be studied formally. Also, the precise reason for increased heart-failure hospitalizations among ICD recipients must be explored.

— Hugh Calkins, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology January 1, 2003

Citation(s):

Moss AJ et al. for the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002 Mar 21; 346:877-83.

Bigger JT. Expanding indications for implantable cardiac defibrillators. N Engl J Med 2002 Mar 21; 346:931-3.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.