From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

How Well Does TEE Predict Recurrent Stroke?

And what are the implications for closure of patent foramen ovale using percutaneous intervention?

It is possible to close a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in stroke patients using a percutaneous device, which has led many physicians to recommend this procedure despite a lack of randomized data to document its benefit. Before assessing the value of intervention, we first must know how well we can predict risk for adverse events in medically treated patients with PFO. Toward that end, researchers studied transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings from 601 ischemic-stroke patients (mean age, 59) who had been enrolled in a double-blind study of aspirin versus warfarin for preventing stroke recurrence and death.

TEE findings included PFO (34%), atrial septal aneurysm (SA; 12%), prominent eustachian valve (EV; 35%), and right-atrial (RA) filamentous strands (19%). During 2-year follow-up, there were 71 recurrent ischemic strokes and 21 deaths (an overall event rate of 15%). Event rates did not differ significantly between patients with both PFO and SA and patients with neither feature, both in the overall study group and in the subgroup with cryptogenic stroke (roughly 40% of patients); patients with PFO/SA and prominent EV or RA filamentous strands had event rates similar to those of patients with none of those 4 features, both in the overall study group and in the cryptogenic-stroke subgroup. Among PFO/SA patients, event rates did not differ between warfarin and aspirin recipients.

Comment: These data fail to support the common conception that TEE findings can aid prediction of ischemic-stroke recurrence. Other studies have linked PFO/SA with risk for stroke recurrence (e.g., Journal Watch Cardiology Jan 18 2002), but patients in those studies were younger than patients in this one. It is possible that medical therapy equalizes the effect of anatomy on recurrence. However, given the high rate of adverse events (15% in this study), we clearly need a randomized trial of whether percutaneous-device closure is effective prevention.

— Howard C. Herrmann, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology October 24, 2003

Citation(s):

Homma S et al. Atrial anatomy in non-cardioembolic stroke patients: Effect of medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 Sep 17; 42:1066-72.

Castello R and Brott TG. Patent foramen ovale: Friend or foe? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 Sep 17; 42:1073-5.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.