From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Folic Acid Not Beneficial for Secondary Prevention

Elevated homocysteine levels are associated with adverse cardiovascular events, and folic-acid therapy reduces homocysteine levels. In this open-label, prospective trial from the Netherlands, researchers randomized 593 consecutive outpatients with coronary artery disease to folic acid (0.5 mg daily) or standard care. All had been taking statins for at least 3 months.

The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics, including mean plasma homocysteine levels of 12 µmol/L. By 3 months, homocysteine levels had decreased among folic-acid recipients (by 18%) but not among controls. By a mean follow-up of 24 months, clinical vascular events (i.e., death, MI, stroke, invasive coronary procedures, vascular surgery) had occurred at similar rates in folic-acid (12.3%) and standard-care (11.2%) recipients; the similarity also was evident among patients in the highest quartile of baseline homocysteine level (>13.7 µmol/L). In multivariate analysis, poor creatinine clearance was a more important cardiovascular risk factor than elevated homocysteine level was.

Comment: In this study of CAD patients, folic acid was no better than standard care in preventing adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years. However, statin use in both groups may have masked any relative benefit of folic acid. Although the folic-acid dose was lower here than in some other studies, folic-acid recipients -- particularly those with the highest baseline homocysteine levels -- showed noteworthy homocysteine declines. Nonetheless, given the amount of homocysteine reduction observed, the study may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups in clinical events. Whether homocysteine is a marker or a causative factor in cardiac disease remains unresolved.

— Howard C. Herrmann, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology August 8, 2003

Citation(s):

Liem A et al. Secondary prevention with folic acid: Effects on clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 Jun 18; 41:2105-13.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.