From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Top Story

Off-Pump CABG Clears Another Hurdle

Nonrandomized studies in selected patients have documented similar in-hospital outcomes and graft patency with on-pump and off-pump (beating-heart) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but shorter hospital stays with the off-pump procedure. In a recent randomized trial, 3-month graft patency was significantly better with on-pump than with off-pump CABG, but less surgeon experience with the off-pump procedure could have played a role (Journal Watch Cardiology Feb 6 2004).

In a new, partly industry-supported, randomized trial of on-pump versus off-pump CABG at one academic center, researchers enrolled patients unselected for coronary anatomy, ventricular function, or comorbidities. Of 297 patients screened, 200 were randomized. A surgeon experienced in both types of CABG performed the surgeries. Patients were subsequently managed according to blinded protocols.

At both 30 days and 1 year, the two groups had similar rates of graft patency, death, stroke, MI, angina, and reintervention, and they had similar 1-year health-related quality-of-life scores. Total hospitalization costs per patient were a significant $2272 lower with off-pump CABG by initial hospital discharge and a marginally significant $1955 lower by 1 year.

Comment: In this randomized trial among unselected patients who underwent elective surgery, off-pump CABG at the hands of an experienced surgeon at an academic center yielded 30-day and 1-year graft patency, cardiac outcomes, and health-related quality of life that were similar to those for on-pump CABG -- and at a lower cost. The applicability to other settings must be explored in larger, multicenter randomized trials.

— JoAnne M. Foody, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 31, 2004

Citation(s):

Puskas JD et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting -- Early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: A randomized trial. JAMA 2004 Apr 21; 291:1841-9.

Peterson ED and Mark DB. Off-pump bypass surgery -- Ready for the big dance? JAMA 2004 Apr 21; 291:1897-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.