From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Should D-Dimer Testing Guide the Duration of Anticoagulation After Unprovoked VTE?

Patients with abnormal D-dimer results benefited from extended anticoagulation, but we still don’t know the overall value of D-dimer testing in guiding decision making after 3 months of standard anticoagulation therapy.

Experts still debate the optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy after a venous thromboembolism (VTE) event without a clear precipitant. Can D-dimer testing identify those patients who benefit from prolonged anticoagulation?

Researchers in Italy conducted a study involving 608 adults (mean age, 63; 52% men) who had been treated with warfarin or acenocoumarol for 3 months after apparently unprovoked, symptomatic VTE. D-dimer testing was done 1 month after subjects stopped anticoagulation therapy. Those with abnormally elevated D-dimer results (223 patients) were randomized to resume anticoagulation therapy (103) or to remain off it (120); those with normal D-dimer levels (385 patients) did not continue anticoagulation therapy. Mean follow-up was 1.4 years.

Among subjects with abnormal D-dimer levels, recurrent VTE was significantly more common in the non-resumption group than in the resumption group (15% vs. 3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.23–14.6). Among subjects with normal D-dimer levels, the incidence of recurrent VTE was 6%, not significantly higher than in the elevated D-dimer group that resumed anticoagulation. The only major bleeding event occurred in a patient in the resumption group.

Comment: Interpreting these findings is difficult because the threshold for an abnormal D-dimer result was not defined and because D-dimer testing was delayed until after subjects had stopped anticoagulation therapy for 1 month. More important, the data do not show whether a strategy of continuous anticoagulation therapy for everyone in the trial would have been better than a strategy of using D-dimer testing to guide decisions about anticoagulation. Without that evidence, D-dimer testing after 3 months of anticoagulation therapy in patients with apparently unprovoked VTE remains a strategy of uncertain value.

— Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology October 25, 2006

Citation(s):

Palareti G et al. for the PROLONG Investigators. D-dimer testing to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy. N Engl J Med 2006 Oct 26; 355:1780-9.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.