From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

What’s the Best Drug Therapy for Preventing ICD Shocks?

Amiodarone plus beta-blockade — but that’s not the whole story.

Implantable-cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prolong the survival of many patients by delivering lifesaving, though painful, shocks for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). In addition to these appropriate shocks, ICDs sometimes deliver unnecessary shocks for atrial arrhythmias. By suppressing arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs have the potential to prevent the need for lifesaving shocks and to avoid unnecessary shocks. But do they perform any better than standard beta-blocker therapy alone?

Researchers addressed this question in an international trial involving 412 patients (mean age, 64; 80% men; maximum LV ejection fraction, 40%) who had recently received St. Jude Medical dual-chamber ICDs for inducible or spontaneous VT or VF. Subjects were randomized to receive standard beta-blocker therapy alone, sotalol alone, or standard beta-blocker therapy plus amiodarone for 1 year.

Incidence of the primary endpoint — the first occurrence of any ICD shock — was significantly lower in the amiodarone group (10.3%) than in the sotalol group (24.3%) or the standard-therapy group (38.5%). The difference between the sotalol and standard-therapy groups did not quite reach significance. Results were similar for appropriate and inappropriate shocks. Notably, amiodarone recipients experienced more adverse pulmonary events, thyroid events, and symptomatic bradycardia than the other groups did.

Comment: These results validate what physicians who care for large numbers of ICD patients already know: Amiodarone effectively prevents many ICD shocks. However, enthusiasm for using amiodarone for this purpose must be balanced against its risk for important short- and long-term side effects. Also, we don't know (1) how sotalol plus standard beta-blocker therapy would have performed against amiodarone plus a beta-blocker or (2) how antiarrhythmic therapy would do against catheter ablation for preventing ICD shocks.

— Hugh Calkins, MD

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology February 2, 2006

Citation(s):

Connolly SJ et al. for the Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Investigators. Comparison of ß-blockers, amiodarone plus ß-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The OPTIC Study: A randomized trial. JAMA 2006 Jan 11; 295:165-71.

Page RL. Antiarrhythmic drugs for all patients with an ICD? JAMA 2006 Jan 11; 295:211-3.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2006. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.