From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Off-Pump vs. On-Pump CABG: 5-Year Data

Cardiovascular outcomes were similar at 5 years, and the rate of cognitive decline was 50% with each type of surgery.

Cognitive decline has been reported in many patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In the Octopus Study, a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump CABG in 281 low-risk patients (mean age, 61; 68% men), the two groups did not differ significantly in their rates of mortality, stroke, or cognitive decline at 3 months or at 1 year (Journal Watch Cardiology Apr 26 2002). Now, we have data from the 260 subjects who survived to the 5-year evaluation.

At 5 years, 50% of each group exhibited cognitive decline, defined as a ≥20% decrease in performance on at least 3 of 11 neuropsychological test variables. Only older age and lower level of education were associated with cognitive decline in a multivariable analysis. The 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in the off-pump and on-pump groups (21% and 18%, respectively). Quality of life also was similar between the groups, except that the on-pump group had slightly fewer role limitations because of physical health.

Comment: This study failed to detect either a cardiovascular or a cognitive advantage of off-pump CABG over on-pump CABG at 5 years. The 5-year rate of cognitive decline in this carefully studied, low-risk trial population was high — 50%. Informed consent for CABG should incorporate information about cognitive risk.

— Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology February 20, 2007

Citation(s):

van Dijk D et al. for the Octopus Study Group. Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2007 Feb 21; 297:701-8.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.