From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Cardiology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Bitter Harvest?

Disturbing long-term observational results suggest that endoscopic vein harvesting for CABG increases the risk for several adverse outcomes.

Endoscopic harvesting of veins for coronary artery bypass grafting has become popular because it reduces the risks for wound infection and postoperative pain compared with vein harvesting under direct vision (open harvesting). However, the long-term effects of endoscopic harvesting on angiographic and clinical outcomes are unknown. The Project of Ex-vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial included 3014 CABG recipients; patients' median age was 64, and almost 80% were men. Individual surgeons decided which vein harvesting method to use; 1753 patients underwent endoscopic harvesting, and 1247 underwent open harvesting.

Results of angiographic assessment 12 to 18 months after surgery were available for 1817 participants. Vein graft failure, defined as stenosis of ≥75% of the vessel diameter, occurred more frequently in patients who underwent endoscopic harvesting than in those who underwent open harvesting (46.7% vs. 38.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.76). At 3-year clinical follow-up, those who underwent endoscopic harvesting also had a higher rate of the composite of death, MI, and revascularization (20.2% vs. 17.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01–1.47) and a higher rate of the composite of death and MI (9.3% vs. 7.6%; adjusted HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.07–1.77).

Comment: This well-done observational study raises important concerns about the use of endoscopic vein harvesting. The short-term benefits might be outweighed by longer-term risks. The decision about the best way to harvest veins for CABG has just gotten a lot more complicated.

Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM

Published in Journal Watch Cardiology July 15, 2009

Citation(s):

Lopes RD et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009 Jul 16; 361:235.

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.